← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76783/2025bail granted

Rajmanti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-27Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76783 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-510 Year-2025 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya ====================================================== Rajmanti Kumari D/o Ram Naresh Manjhi, R/o Vill. - Mocharim, P.S. - Bodh Gaya, Dist. - Gaya(Bihar).

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 27-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No. 510 of 2025, dated 13.07.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 121(1), 121(2), 132, 109 and 352 read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, the petitioner along with other accused persons after having formed an unlawful assembly abused and attacked the police personnel and forcefully released an arrested person namely, Balaji @ Abhimanyu from the police custody and in the course of such scuffle, three police personnel sustained injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits at the outset that the petitioner is a lady having clean antecedent and her

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76783 of 2025(2) dt.27-11-2025 2/2 name has been unnecessarily roped in the present case as she is related to the other co-accused persons. However, upon perusal of the FIR, it would be gathered that specific allegations of assault is on the other male members and as regards the present petitioner, there are general and omnibus allegations.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State on the other hand vehemently opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner who is a lady having clean antecedent, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the Court concerned within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No. 510 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. / Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Shahnawaz/- U T