Bipin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76971 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2017 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Bipin Kumar S/O Mohar Manjhi Roll No. 130114044, Resident of VillageSihoriya, P.S.- Baniyapur, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashad, Advocate For the State :

Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Chhapra Mufassil P.S. Case No. 210 of 2017, dated 22.07.2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 353, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation, the petitioner and other coaccused entered into the office of the informant/Co-ordinator of J.P. University, Chhapra and started arguing in regard to BCA result and used indecent language and even assaulted on his head.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that as a matter of fact, the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76971 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026 2/3 went to the office of the informant regard to the BCA result and there was no indecent behavior made by the petitioner and other co-accused and they wanted the result of BCA which has not been declared yet. Hence, the career of the student was getting spoiled. He further submits that the petitioner is a student and if the petitioner does not get anticipatory bail, his career may get spoiled.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has two criminal antecedents.

7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court below, in connection

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76971 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026 3/3 with Chhapra Mufassil P.S. Case No. 210 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S 2023, and on the following conditions:

(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents other than the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.

(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J) shoaib/- U T