← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./81563/2025bail granted

Sanjit Kumar @ Sanjit Kumar Yadav @ Sajjan Kumar @ Sajjan Kumar Yadav @ Sajjan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-27Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81563 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-461 Year-2023 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Sanjit Kumar @ Sanjit Kumar Yadav @ Sajjan Kumar @ Sajjan Kumar Yadav @ Sajjan Yadav S/o Mushaharu Yadav R/o Village - Kamlabari Belhi, P.S - Jainagar, District - Madhubani, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 27-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 461 of 2023, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 279, 272 and 273 of I.P.C. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 135 liters of Nepali liquor was recovered from Car.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81563 of 2025(2) dt.27-11-2025 2/3 for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has transpired as being owner of the seized vehicle. It is also submitted that petitioner was not apprehended on spot. The petitioner is in custody since 12.09.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 461 of 2023, subject to the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81563 of 2025(2) dt.27-11-2025 3/3 bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) krishnakant/- U T