Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50875/2018bail granted

Santosh Kumar Singh @ Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-10Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50875 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-213 Year-2015 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Santosh Kumar Singh @ Santosh Kumar, Son of Ramjag Singh, Resident of Village- Karan, P.S.- Baghela, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shambhu narayan Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 213 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner has earlier moved this Court for bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 436 of 2018 which was rejected on 17.01.2018 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of six months. Petitioner is in custody since 08.03.2016. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the observation made in order dated 17.01.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 436 of 2018, petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50875 of 2018(3) dt.10-10-2018 2/2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VIth, Patna City in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 213 of 2015 subject to conditions :

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and valid reason trial court shall have liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/ManojU T