Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52836/2018bail granted

Suresh Das v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-05Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52836 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -143 Year- 2015 Thana -AMAS District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Suresh Das son of Sahdeo Das, resident of Village- Akauna, P.S. Amas, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-10-2018 The petitioner is in custody since 05.06.2018 in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 143 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation is of committing murder of brother of the informant.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., later on his name transpired during course of investigation. Further submission is that except suspicion, there is absolutely nothing against the petitioner and charge-sheet has been submitted. The petitioner is in custody since 05.06.2018.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and considering the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52836 of 2018 (3) dt.05-10-2018 2/2 aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sherghati at Gaya, in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 143 of 2015, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T