Abul Kalam Azad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17278 of 2023 ====================================================== Abul Kalam Azad Son of Abdur Rahman, Resident of Village- Mirzapur, P.O. and P.S.- Mehsi, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2.

The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 3.

The District Education Officer, East Champaran at Motihari. 4.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), East Champaran at Motihari.

5.

The Executive Officer, Nagar Employment Unit, Mehsi, P.O. and P.S.- Mehsi, District- East Champaran at Motihari.

6.

The Block Education Officer, Mehsi, P.O. and P.S.- Mehsi, District- East Champaran at Motihari.

7.

Smt Karuna Kumari, Wife of Sri Ajeet Kumar, D/o Kailash Dwivedi, Presently working as Nagar Teacher in Upgraded Middle School, Karbala (Urdu), P.O. and P.S.- Mehsi, District- East Champaran at Motihari. 8.

Prabhawati Kumari, D/o Sri Kishore Prasad, Presently working as Nagar Teacher in Upgraded Middle School, Karbala (Urdu), P.O. and P.S.- Mehsi, District- East Champaran at Motihari.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bipin Bihari Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. U.S.S.Singh, GP-19 Ms. Shobha Chubey, AC to GP-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 14-05-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That the present writ petition is for issuance of an appropriate writ/ writs in nature of MANDAMUS for commanding and directing the respondent authorities for necessary steps towards consideration, adjudication and decision

Patna High Court CWJC No.17278 of 2023(2) dt.14-05-2024 2/2 upon his Complaint Petition containing allegation of illegal appointment and misuse of public exchequer ignoring the statutory provisions and law decided by the Court of Law within specified period keeping in mind the right of timely consideration and decision as well as speedy justice, which are mandatory and obligatory for the respondents and further prayer regarding legal action as provided under law in light of decision taken by competent authority after through enquiry."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondent authorities for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U