Patna High CourtCR. MISC./77954/2025bail granted

Umesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-18Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77954 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-955 Year-2025 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Umesh Kumar S/o Shayam Nandan Mahto R/o Village- Sarariya, P.SLalganj, P.O- Khanjahachak, Dist- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Smita Shreeyash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akbar Ali, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 955 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 69.87 liters liquor was recovered from Scooty.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner was neither owner nor driver of the vehicle and the said

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77954 of 2025(2) dt.18-11-2025 2/2 recovery has been planted for extraneous consideration. The name of the petitioner has been disclosed by the co-accused. The petitioner is in custody since 27.09.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 955 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T