← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17834/2024dismissed

Chandan Patel v. The State Of Bihar

2024-11-27Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy,The Chief Justice-2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17834 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.

Chandan Patel son of Navin Prasad, Resident of Daulatpur, P.S.-Gaurichak, District-Patna.

2.

Mukesh Kumar Raj, son of Badri Narayan Mistri, Resident of House No. -39, East of T.P.S. Collage, Chirayatand, District-Patna-800001. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Director (Secondary Education) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 4.

The Director (Primary Education) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 5.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna. 6.

The District Education Officer, Patna.

7.

Bihar School Examination Board through its Secretary, Patna. 8.

The Examination Controller, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kaushal Kishor, Advocate For the State :

Mr. P.K. Shahi, Advocate General For the Board :

Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Advocate Ms. Kalpana, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 27-11-2024 The petitioners, who are teachers, have filed the writ petition challenging the guidelines under a policy issued for transfer.

2. The learned Advocate General submits that already

Patna High Court CWJC No.17834 of 2024 dt.27-11-2024 2/2 there is a writ petition filed before the learned Single Judge, and on a limited stay order being issued, the entire policy has been withdrawn by the State Government.

3. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, without prejudice to any subsequent grievance being agitated.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) P.K.P./- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 27.11.2024 Transmission Date