Jatahu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78031 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-305 Year-2023 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== Jatahu Yadav S/o Lakshman Yadav Resident of Village - Baharkurwa, Ward No. 05, P.S - Triveniganj, District - Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ansul, senior Advocate Mr. Shyam Kishore, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-11-2025 Heard Mr. Ansul, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Madhura Nand Jha , learned A.P.P. for the State .
2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 364, 120-B and 34 of IPC and later on 302 and 201 of IPC was added. 3 . The prosecution case, in brief, is that the informant, Subash Kumar Yadav, alleged that on 18.07.2023 at about 3:00 A.M., his son proceeded to the agricultural field but did not return . Upon search, informant ascertained that his son
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78031 of 2025(2) dt.24-11-2025 2/3 was involved in an intimate relationship with co-accused Chandani Kumari, on account of which all the accused persons used to threaten the son of informant. Informant suspects that due to aforesaid reason , this petitioner along with other coaccused persons killed the deceased.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that F.I.R. has been lodged against 6 accused persons including this petitioner. Informant is not an eye witness to the alleged occurrence . Only suspicion has been raised against this petitioner. It is further submitted that during trial, the eyewitnesses have turned hostile and there is no material to connect the petitioners with the alleged crime . Petitioner is in custody since 21.06.2025 . Similarly situated co-accused persons has already been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 08.10.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 22861 of 2025 .
5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the bail application.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, materials available on record, period of custody and other circumstances of the case , the bail application is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78031 of 2025(2) dt.24-11-2025 3/3 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM Supaul in connection with Triveniganj P. S. Case No. 305 of 2023 . (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T