Binod Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20540 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -379 Year- 2017 Thana -RAJAULI District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Binod Chaudhary S/o Nand Kishere Chaudhary @ L..., R/o Village- Dih Rajauli, P.S.- Rajauli, District- Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajauli P.S.Case No. 379 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation against the petitioner is of assault by Baretha, a hard and blunt substance, to the brother of the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner and no injury was found on the person of the brother of the informant.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20540 of 2018 (4) dt.19-06-2018 2/2 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer of bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 379 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 ( 2) Cr.P.C. with other that bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned and petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and shall be present before the police as and when required, otherwise, prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T