Amrit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84996 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2021 Thana- ANDHRAMATH District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
Amrit Yadav S/O Ram Dev Yadav 2.
Shiv Shankar Yadav S/O Ram Dev Yadav Both R/O village Jarauli, P.S.- Andhramath, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Hriday Narayan Harshit, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 21-02-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioners in this application pray for bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Andhramath P.S. Case no.73 of 2021 (G.R. no.1151 of 2021) registered for the offence punishable under sections 307, 379, 341, 323, 324, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the five named accused persons including the two petitioners herein came variously armed. Sumrit Yadav is said to have assaulted the informant with a sharp cutting weapon while the others are said to have brutally assaulted with lathi as a result of which the informant is said to be injured.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84996 of 2024(6) dt.21-02-2025 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. The injury report does not support the allegation so far as the petitioners are concerned. Only one injury of incised wound has been found which is directly attributable to Sumrit Yadav. So far as the four accused persons including the two petitioners herein are concerned, as against the allegation of brutal assault by all of them, one abrasion injury ie abrasion on the left forearm only has been found. The petitioners undertake to cooperate in the case/trial.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioners in the FIR, the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners together with the contents of the injury report, it is directed that both the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Andhramath P.S. Case no.73 of 2021 (G.R. no.1151 of 2021) on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84996 of 2024(6) dt.21-02-2025 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Jhanjharpur, District Madhubani.
(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T