← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69923/2019bail granted

Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-11-27The Chief Justice -4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69923 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-481 Year-2019 Thana- DIGHA District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

SANTOSH KUMAR Son of Surendra Singh Resident of VillageDiwantoke, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, District- Vaishali. 2.

Sanjay Kumar Sonof Chandradeo Rai Resident of Village- Diwantoke, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, District- Vaishali.

3.

Ram Pravesh Rai Son of Late Bhuletan Rai Resident of Village- Saraipur, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Dubey, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 27-11-2019 Instant petition under Sections 439 and 440 of Criminal Procedure Code has been moved for grant of bail in Special Case No.7475 of 2019 arising out of F.I.R. No. 481 of 2019, dated 20.8.2019, registered at Police Station Digha under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. I have also perused the relevant record of the case, necessary for adjudication of this petition.

Allegedly, 150 of illicit liquor was recovered from a tempo, which fact is seriously disputed by the petitioners. Prima

2/4 facie also it appears that thus far no case against the petitioners is made out indicating their complicity in the alleged crime. Recovery is from an area accessible to general public. Planting of the substance has not been ruled out by the prosecution. Prima facie, nothing is produced to highlight petitioners' direct involvement in the crime. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have roots in the society; are not likely to interfere in the investigation or influence any of the witnesses or destroy the evidence; are behind bars since 21.8.2019; no further recovery is to be made from the petitioners, nor any custodial interrogation is required and they have fully cooperated in the investigation.

Keeping in view the provision of the special enactment i.e. Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, this Court is of the considered view that petitioners have made out a case for grant of bail. Possibility of false implication as is so alleged by the petitioners cannot be ruled out. Also, thus far save and except for naming the petitioners in the F.I.R., no evidence corroborative in nature stands recorded by the police. Also, none has come forward to highlight the possible involvement of the petitioners in the crime. On what basis the

3/4 Investigating Officer could link the accused to the crime is also not emanating from the record.

Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna in connection with Special Case No.7475 of 2019 arising out of Digha P.S. Case No. 481 of 2019, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be their close relative.

(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(iv) The petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the

4/4 State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. Any observation made herein shall not be construed to be an expression on the merits of the matter. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) K.C.Jha/- U T