Bhola Ram And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17328 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2017 Thana- MOKAMAH District- Patna ======================================================

1. Bhola Ram, Son of Late Sitaram Ram,

2. Arvind @ Arvind Kumar, Son of Karu Ram, Both resident of Village- Mor Paschim, Police Station- Mokama, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Mokama P.S. case no. 47 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 is the Bhaisur whereas petitioner no.2 is Devar of the deceased. They have no concern with the affairs of the husband of the deceased .

In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17328 of 2018(4) dt.08-05-2018 2/2 of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Mokama P.S. case no. 47/17, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJMIV, Barh (Patna), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T