Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78916 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-250 Year-2025 Thana- GOH District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Yadav Son of Not given R/o Village- Dulahbigha, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-12-2025 Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Goh P.S. Case No. 250 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is of causing assault by means of spade over the head of the informant, besides snatching of Rs. 4,500/-, on the exhortation made by coaccused Balchand Yadav.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that the parties are agnates and on account of a land dispute, they entered into a scuffle, resulting into some unfortunate injuries. Moreover, there is a counter version of the present case being
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78916 of 2025(2) dt.17-12-2025 2/3 Goh P.S. Case No. 253 of 2025, instituted against the informant and others. In the said incidence, the petitioner also sustained injury. So far the injury, which is allegedly sustained to the informant is concerned, though the same is found to be grievous in nature, but sustained over the second metacarpal bone of the left hand and, as such, it is on non vital part. The petitioner bears fair antecedent and he undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the Court.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State opposed the pre-arrest bail application and submits that there is a specific allegation against the petitioner of causing assault, leading to grievous injury.
6. Having considered the submissions advanced by learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the nature of accusation qua the injury, besides the factum of case and counter case and the fair antecedent of the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate - 1st Class,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78916 of 2025(2) dt.17-12-2025 3/3 Daudnagar in connection with Goh P.S. Case No. 250 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.
(Harish Kumar, J) shivank/- U T