← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76460/2025allowed

Umesh Bharti v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-19Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76460 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2025 Thana- DAUDPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Umesh Bharti, S/o Rajnath Bharti, R/o Village - Chainpur, P.S - Garkha, District - Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 Heard Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Narsingh Tanti, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Daudpur P.S. Case No. 204 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 109, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that this petitioner has assaulted with knife to Munna Giri in which his right spleen became injured. When the informant tried to rescue his brother, Nikku Bharti assaulted him with intention to kill on which he received injury on his arm.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76460 of 2025(2) dt.19-11-2025 2/2 case. It is a dispute between two brother-in-laws. It has also been submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties. A complaint case was also filed from the side of the petitioner. It has also been submitted that in the scuffle both sides have received injuries. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 14.08.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that from perusal of the order of learned trial Court, it is clear that Munna Giri has received sharp cut injuries.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Daudpur P.S. Case No. 204 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T