Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14777/2018bail granted

Mridula Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-05-01Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14777 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2017 Thana- AAYAR District- Bhojpur ======================================================

1. MRIDULA DEVI, W/o Shankar Sharma,

2. Shankar Sharma S/o Laxman Sharma, Both R/o VillageBaligaon, P.S.- Ayar , District- Bhojpur at Ara. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shiv Prasad Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Rabindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Ayar P. S case no. 41 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section 304 (B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that petitioners are mother-in-law and father-in-law of the deceased. The husband of the deceased is already in custody. The occurrence took place on 13.6.2017. The F.I.R. was lodged on 18.6. 2017 In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Ayar P. S case no. 41

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14777 of 2018(4) dt.01-05-2018 2/2 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Bhojpur at Ara, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T