Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22207/2018dismissed

Rajiv Ranjan Das v. The State Of Bihar

2018-05-01Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22207 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -220 Year- 2015 Thana -BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBHAGALPUR ====================================================== RAJIV RANJAN DAS S/o Late Bishwanath Das, Permanent R/o MohallaBhikhanpur, Gumati No.1, P.S.- Ishakchak, District- Bhagalpur,At Present - B-304, P.S.- Mira Road, District- Thane, Mumbai-401107. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhileshwar Pd. Singh, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra Kr Rai For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Narsingh Tanti For the Informant : Mr. Ranjan Kr. Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) P.S. Case No. 220 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that as per agreement the petitioner was not releasing the film, for that he was provided with Rs.5,00,000/-.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the matter relates to civil dispute and due to non-compliance of agreement the film was not supplied.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22207 of 2018 (4) dt.01-05-2018 2/2 Heard learned APP and learned counsel for the informant. They have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground that process under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. has already been issued against the petitioner, as such, this application is not maintainable.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

However, if petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, the same shall be disposed of by learned court below, if possible, on the same day.

With the above observation, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U