← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./77084/2025bail granted

Md. Chand @ Sakir Raza @ Chand @ Md. Sakir Raza v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-17Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77084 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2025 Thana- Marnga District- Purnia ====================================================== Md. Chand @ Sakir Raza @ Chand @ Md. Sakir Raza S/O Md. Ayub @ Ayub Ansari R/O Village- Vikrampatti, ward No. 8, P.S- Maranga, DistrictPurnea @ Purnia. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv.for Informant ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offence under Section 103(1) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per F.I.R., on 26.01.2025 at around 7 AM, the accused persons named in the F.I.R. including this petitioner came in the house of informant and took her son with them on the pretext of flag hoisting, but son of informant did not return and on the next day, his dead-body was recovered in a field behind Kali Mandir. Informant believes that F.I.R. named accused persons including this petitioner have committed murder of her son.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77084 of 2025(2) dt.17-11-2025 2/2

4. As per F.I.R., petitioner was last seen with the deceased. Informant is not eye-witness to the occurrence. Both parties are close door neighbours and there is land dispute between the parties and only on account of suspicion, petitioner has been made accused in this case. There is no material on record of his participation in the occurrence. Petitioner has got clean antecedent and is in custody since 22.07.2025. Chargesheet has been submitted.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as period of custody and clean antecedent, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Purnea in connection with Maranga P.S. Case No. 21 of 2025.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T