← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30231/2018bail granted

Asha Devi v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-07-04Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30231 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -207 Year- 2017 Thana -NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictNALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Asha Devi, Wife of Manoj Chaudhary, Resident of Mohalla- Mahalper, P.S.- Bihar, District- Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Yogendra Prasad, S/o Late Harilal Mahto, R/o Mohalla- Mahalpar, P.S.- Biharsharif, Dist- Nalanda.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Priya Saran Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 207C of 2017 lodged for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner and her husband is that they have executed an agreement and taken Rs.5 lakhs from the complainant but they have not executed sale deed and not returned the amount.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is he is witness to the agreement for sale and there is allegation that she has received money.

Heard learned APP and learned counsel for the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30231 of 2018 (3) dt.04-07-2018 2/2 complainant, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Complaint Case No. 207C of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition is that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U