Amarnath Singh @ Guddu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.15301 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -358 Year- 2016 Thana -SHERGHATI District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Amarnath Singh @ Guddu S/o Vijay Singh, R/o Village- Lagan Takiya Badhai Tola, Sherghati, P.S.- Sherghati, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Atul Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-06-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 358 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping minor daughter of the informant.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the girl is not minor, which is evident from annexure -2, which is her school leaving certificate and the girl has married with the petitioner out of her own sweet will and a certificate in this regard has been filed, which is annexure -3 of this petition. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15301 of 2018 (3) dt.19-06-2018 2/2 of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Sherghati, Gaya, in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 358 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T