Vinod Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72127 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-883 Year-2019 Thana- KOTWALI District- Patna ====================================================== VINOD RAI Son of Lala Rai Resident of Village - Tely Sarai, P.S.- Soria, District - Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 36(1), (2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Allegation is of recovery of 16.875 Litre of illicit liquor from the possession of the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that nothing was recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 04.10.2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72127 of 2019(2) dt.04-12-2019 2/2 case is pending in connection with Spl. Case No. 8815/2019 (arising out of Kotwali P.S. Case No. 883 of 2019), with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T