Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83179 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2024 Thana- DANDARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Singh S/o Nandlal Singh R/o vill - Hathla (Hathila), P.S. - Karai Parsurai, Distt.- nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 09-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation in the first information report is that two daughters of the informant and her friend were kidnapped by the petitioner Rahul Kumar with the help of his friend Suraj Kumar.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as a matter of fact the father of one of the victim girls Chulbuli was settling her marriage without her consent and it is due to this reason that she fled away along with her sister and friend in a fit of anger. The petitioner happens to be a relative of the victim girls and the entire story of kidnapping against him is false. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83179 of 2024(5) dt.09-07-2025 2/2 petitioner is actually a government employee working in the Indian Railway Service. Further, the statement of the victim girls have been recorded both under Sections 161 and 164 of the Cr.P.C. and upon perusal of the same, it would appear that the girls have stated that no kidnapping was done and they had gone voluntarily by their own will as there was a pressure of marriage without consent.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for anticipatory bail.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also the statement of the victim girl recorded under Sections 161 and 164 of the Cr.P.C., let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dandari P.S. Case No. 06 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S. devendra/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T