← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./77839/2025allowed

Pandav Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-11Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77839 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2024 Thana- KURSAILA District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.

Pandav Mahto S/O Ramdev Mahto R/O Village - Balu Tola, Ward No.- 11, P.S- Kursela, Dist- Katihar 2.

Nitish Kumar S/O Pandav Mahto R/O Village - Balu Tola, Ward No.- 11, P.S- Kursela, Dist- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nityanand, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Kursela P.S. Case No. 128 of 2024, instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118, 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, on the date of occurrence petitioners along with F.I.R. named accused persons armed with deadly weapon entered into the house of informant and assaulted his son causing injury. When the wife and younger son of the informant came to save, the accused persons also assaulted them. Accused persons snatched golden chain from the neck of the wife of informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77839 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. There is no specific allegation against the petitioners. Injuries on the injured are simple in nature. Due to some dispute between the parties, occurrence took place, however, they have settled the dispute. Petitioners have no criminal antecedents. Petitioners undertake to co-operate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Katihar in connection with Kursela P.S. Case No. 128 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) rakhi/- U T