Md. Nehaluddin And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3275 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Md. Nehaluddin, S/o-Late Md. Moinuddin @ Late M.S.S. Moinuddin, Resident of Bari Haweli Road, Saguna Mainpura, P.S. Danapur, District-Patna.

2. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, S/o-Sri Sheo Kumar Prasad, Resident ofPragati Vihar Colony, P.S.-Ram Krishna Nagar, District-Patna.

3. Mahesh Kumar Choudhary, S/o Late Gopi Chaudhary, Resident of - Nandu Tola (Purani Devi Asthan), P.S.-Khagaul, District-Patna.

4. Tarkeshwar Prasad Gupta, S/o-Late Lal Babu Gupta, Resident of - Bakerganj Bazaza, P.S.-Pirbahote, District-Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of BIhar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration, Government of BIhar, Patna.

4. The Principal Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Government of BIhar, Patna.

5. The Chief Engineer, Central Research and Quality Control, Water Resources Department, Anishabad, Patna.

6. The Superintending Engineer, Research and Training Circle, Khagaul, Patna.

7. THe Executive Engineer, Research and Training Division-1, Khagaul, Patna.

8. THe Executive Engineer, Research and Training Division-2, Khagaul, Patna.

9. THe Executive Engineer, Research and Training Division-3, Khagaul, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Onkar Nath For the Respondent/s : Mr. Harish Kumar- GP 8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 12-03-2018 Heard.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied in case they are granted a liberty

Patna High Court CWJC No.3275 of 2018 (2) dt.12-03-2018 2/2 to file representation before the respondent no.2 and the respondent no.2 may be directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioners within a specified time frame. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner may file a composite representation before the respondent no.2 within a period of two weeks from today and the respondent no.2 is directed to dispose of the same within a period of four weeks thereafter.

The writ petition is disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U