Anjali Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77420 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.
Anjali Kumari D/O Umesh Sharma Resident of Village- Bathwa Manjha, Ward No. 13, Police Station- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj 2.
Nikita Kumari @ Nikki Kumari D/O Umesh Sharma Resident of VillageBathwa Manjha, Ward No. 13, Police Station- Manjhagarh, DistrictGopalganj 3.
Raj Kumari Devi W/O Umesh Sharma Resident of Village- Bathwa Manjha, Ward No. 13, Police Station- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj 4.
Umesh Sharma S/O Bidha Sharma Resident of Village- Bathwa Manjha, Ward No. 13, Police Station- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj 5.
Bidha Sharma S/O Late Firangi Sharma Resident of Village- Bathwa Manjha, Ward No. 13, Police Station- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj 6.
Abhishek Kumar Sharma @ Abhishek Sharma S/O Umesh Sharma Resident of Village- Bathwa Manjha, Ward No. 13, Police Station- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Ms. Mili Kumari, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, on 27.02.2025, all these accused petitioners, armed with iron rod and danda, assaulted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77420 of 2025(2) dt.11-12-2025 2/3 wife of informant.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, both parties are Pataidars and on account of petty dispute with regard to drainage of water, a simple scuffle took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Injuries, sustained by the injured, are simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter-case between the parties, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VI,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77420 of 2025(2) dt.11-12-2025 3/3 Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 71 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T