Ranjeet Kumar @ Bittu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70288 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-287 Year-2017 Thana- SHASTRINAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== RANJEET KUMAR @ BITTU Son of Navin Kumar Resident of Village - Hasanpura, P.S.- Beur, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Niraj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he persuaded the Headmaster to issue a certificate to show the accused as juvenile. It is submitted that the Headmaster has been granted bail by this Court as contained in Annexure- 2 and co-accused Bhola Kumar @ Ravi Shankar has been granted regular bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 27.09.2019 in Cr. Misc. No. 59394/2019 as contained in Annexure-6. Petitioner is in custody since 18.03.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70288 of 2019(2) dt.04-12-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Shashtri Nagar P. S. Case No. 287 of 2017 with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T