Pradeep Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82337 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-339 Year-2023 Thana- KUDRA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.

Pradeep Ram Sonof Jugal Ram @ Jugul Ram @ Ugal Kishor Ram R/O Village Dihara, P.S.- Kudra, Dist.- Kaimur (BHABUA) 2.

Prabhat Ram @ Prabhat Kumar Ram Son Of Doma Ram R/O Village Dihara, P.S.- Kudra, Dist.- Kaimur (BHABUA) 3.

Gorakh Ram Son Of Ram Dawan Ram R/O Village Dihara, P.S.- Kudra, Dist.- Kaimur (BHABUA) 4.

Satendra Ram @ Satendra Kumar Son Of Ram Dawan Ram R/O Village Dihara, P.S.- Kudra, Dist.- Kaimur (BHABUA) 5.

Tija Devi W/O Ashok Ram R/O Village Dihara, P.S.- Kudra, Dist.- Kaimur (BHABUA) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chandra Mohan Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 05-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 447, 323, 354, 507, 379, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant, her son and her daughter. They also tried to outrage her modesty.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82337 of 2023(2) dt.05-01-2024 2/2 this case. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injury. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No. 339 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

devendra/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U T