Surajdeo Yadav @ Master Jee @ Guru Jee v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82445 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-364 Year-2023 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya ====================================================== Surajdeo Yadav @ Master Jee @ Guru Jee Son Of Late Kishun Yadav R/O Village- Akothara, P.S.- Gurua, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 82578 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-364 Year-2023 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya ====================================================== Binod Yadav @ Vinod Yadav Son Of Ganeshi Yadav Resident Of Village - Lachhnaiti, P.S. - Sherghati, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 82445 of 2023) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shantanu Kumar (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 82578 of 2023) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Md. Javed Jafar Khan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 364 of 2023 registered for the offence under Section 386 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, some unknown persons are
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82445 of 2023(2) dt.20-12-2023 2/3 said to have demanded Rs. 2,00,000/- as ransom from the informant and also threatened him.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. The petitioners are not named in the FIR. Their name came into light during course of investigation. Ransom money has not been executed. It is further submitted that the petitioners have not been put on TIP and they are languishing in judicial custody since 16.8.2023.
5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody period of the petitioners, this court is inclined to enlarge them on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 364 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sherghati Gaya.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Amandeep/- U T
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82445 of 2023(2) dt.20-12-2023 3/3