Sarvajeet Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80842 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2019 Thana- EKMA District- Saran ====================================================== Sarvajeet Ram Son of Late Marai Ram, Resident of Village - Chakmira, P.S.- Ekma, Distt - Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Narendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 124 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under sections 447, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

From the FIR it appears that the dispute arose on account of money matter as he has claimed transaction of Rs.50,000/- that led to filing of case and counter case from both sides.

Allegation has been made against Sarvajeet Ram, petitioner to have caused injury by Farsa. The injury report which is Annexure-2 shows that the other side received simple injury as well as the petitioner received grievous injury. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80842 of 2019(6) dt.23-02-2021 2/2 other side has been granted bail.

Looking to the entirety of the matter, let the petitioner above named in event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saran/Successor Court in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 124 of 2019, subject to condition as laid down under section 438 (2) Cr.PC and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his close relative. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. In case of failure on two consecutive dates without any valid reason, the court below will have liberty to take decision in accordance with law.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T