Jeetan Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82188 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2023 Thana- MANSAHI District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.

JEETAN MAHTO SON OF LATE MISHRI MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- TERASI TOLA, DUMARIYA BISHUNPUR, P.O. AND P.S.- MANSAHI, DISTRICT- KATIHAR 2.

SANJEET MAHTO SON OF LATE SUDHIR MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- TERASI TOLA, DUMARIYA BISHUNPUR, P.O. AND P.S.- MANSAHI, DISTRICT- KATIHAR 3.

RANJEET MAHTO SON OF LATE SUDHIR MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- TERASI TOLA, DUMARIYA BISHUNPUR, P.O. AND P.S.- MANSAHI, DISTRICT- KATIHAR 4.

MAHAVIR KUMAR SON OF GOPAL MAHTO RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- TERASI TOLA, DUMARIYA BISHUNPUR, P.O. AND P.S.- MANSAHI, DISTRICT- KATIHAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mahesh Narayan Parbat, Sr. Adv.

Mr.Praveen Prabhakar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 307, 354, 504, 506/34 IPC. 3.

Allegedly, the petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant's side indiscriminately.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82188 of 2023(2) dt.04-01-2024 2/2 They have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged has ever taken place. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. For the alleged occurrence, there is case and counter-case between the parties and also there is an admitted land dispute between the parties. The injuries were found simple in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. 5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Mansahi P.S. Case No.92 of 2023, GR No.3599 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T