Lalit Vijay Kumar @ Lali Dhadhi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77546 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2025 Thana- Hathiyav District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== 1.
Lalit Vijay Kumar @ Lali Dhadhi S/o Nande Dhadhi @ Nandlal Ram R/o Village - Mandana, P.S - Hathiyawan, District - Sheikhpura 2.
Vishal Kumar S/o Chunchun Dhadhi R/o Village - Mandana, P.S - Hathiyawan, District - Sheikhpura 3.
Manoj Dhadhi @ Manoj Ram S/o Bharosa Dhadhi R/o Village - Mandana, P.S - Hathiyawan, District - Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP For Informant : Mr. Rajnish Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. As per prosecution case, on the alleged date of occurrence while the informant was watering his land, the named accused persons including petitioners armed with iron rod, lathi-danda came there and started abusing the informant and upon refusing, they started assaulting the informant due to which he sustained injuries.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77546 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. There is land dispute between both the parties The injuries caused to the injured are found to be simple in nature. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they undertake to cooperate in the investigation and the trial.
5. Learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Sheikhpura in connection with Hathiyawan P.S. Case No.45 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Harish/- U T