Gaurav Kumar @ Gourav Kumar v. The Vice Chancellor, B. R. Ambedkar, Bihar University And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5583 of 2018 ====================================================== Gaurav Kumar @ Gourav Kumar Son of Brajkant Jha Resident of Ward no. 24, Drashaniya Aashram, Pandit B.N.jha Path, P.S. Deoghar District Deoghar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Vice Chancellor, B. R. Ambedkar, Bihar University Muzaffarpur.

2. The Registrar, B.R.A. Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

3. The Examination Controller, B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

4. The Principle of R.D. Roy, L.M. Degree College, Chehrakalan, Vaishali. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Vikas Ratan Bharti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-04-2018 The petitioner claims that he had appeared for B. Sc. Part-III examination, held by B. R. A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, in 2015. His result has not been published. Accordingly, a direction is being sought to the University to publish the result.

There is no explanation as to what the petitioner was doing from 2015 till for the first time in February, 2018, he claims to have approached the Examination Controller of the University by way of representation, which has been brought on record by way of Annexure-2 to the writ application. On reading of Annexure-2, I find that there is no acknowledgement in respect of receipt of the said representation by any Officer of the University. It is stated that the said

Patna High Court CWJC No.5583 of 2018(2) dt.10-04-2018 2/2 representation has been sent to the Examination Controller of the University through registered post.

In the background of the facts, as noted above, I am not inclined to entertain this application by passing a positive direction, as sought for.

This application is disposed of, however, with an observation that the petitioner shall be at liberty to pursue his grievance before the Examination Controller of the University. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Prabhakar Anand/- U √