Patna High CourtCWJC/8512/2018disposed

Raman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-12-03Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran,Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8512 of 2018 In Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.170 of 2018 ====================================================== Raman Kumar son of Suresh Sah, resident of village- Prem Nagar, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna

3. The Inspector General of Police, Tirhut Range, Muzaffarpur

4. The Collector-cum- District Magistrate, Sitamarhi

5. The Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi

6. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sitamarhi

7. The Circle Officer-cum-Executive Magistrate, Sitamarhi

8. The Station Head Officer, Dumara at Sitamarhi

9. The I. O.-cum- Sub-Inspector of Police, Dumra at Sitamarhi ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Vikash Kumar- Sc11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) 03-12-2018 Heard the parties.

Taking note of the fact that the confiscation order has already been passed and the same is appealable under the provisions of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file an appeal in accordance with law. Let this application be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal within a period of 30 days from today and in case such an appeal is filed within prescribed period, the appellate authority shall consider the same keeping in mind that

Patna High Court CWJC No.8512 of 2018(4) dt.03-12-2018 2/2 the petitioner was pursuing the matter before this Court and the appeal shall be heard on its own merit. If necessary, the petitioner shall file an application seeking condonation of delay. (Jyoti Saran, J) ( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U