Pawan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.20773 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -415 Year- 2016 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictGOPALGANJ ====================================================== Pawan Singh S/o Sri Krishna Singh @ Krishan , R/o Village- Karwedi, P.S.- Moana (Mohana), District- Sonipat, Haryana. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-04-2018 Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 13.10.2017 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 49213 of 2017 with direction to learned trial court to conclude the trial within a period of four months, otherwise petitioner will be released on bail by learned trial court to its own satisfaction. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that trial has not been concluded as yet and petitioner is in custody since 28.11.2016.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20773 of 2018 (2) dt.12-04-2018 2/2 satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Gopalganj, in connection with Excise Case No. 415 of 2016, subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of the court concerned and petitioner shall co-operate in trial and appear in court on the date fixed, except on genuine reason, failing which the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
Learned trial court is further directed to expedite the trial without giving unnecessary adjournment and conclude the same within a further period of two months. Needless to say that petitioner has to co-operate in disposal of trial. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U