M/S Avantika Contractors I Ltd. v. The Commissioner Of Central G S T And Central Excise And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6009 of 2018 ====================================================== M/s Avantika Contractors ( I ) Ltd. NTPC, Barh Campus STPP, Barh, Patna having their registered office at Door No. 8-2-603/23/3 & 15 3rd Floor, H S R Summit, beside No. 1 News Channel, Road No. 10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad through their authorized representative Ajay Kumar Singh son of Late Surendra Pd. Singh, Resident of Subhug Sharma, P.S. Rupaspur, District Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Commissioner of Central G S T & Central Excise, Patna II Commissionerate, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna.

2. The Joint Commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax, Patna, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna.

3. The Assistant Commissioner, Central GST, Patna (East) Division, Patna, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna.

4. The Superintendent, Central Excise & Service Tax, Fatuha Circle, Ex Range, 1st Floor Raghuvansh Complex, Station Road, Fatuha.

5. The AXIS Bank Ltd., Court Chamber, 35 Sir V. Thackersey Marg, New Marin Lines, Mumbai.

6. The Branch Manager, Axis Bank Ltd. S.R. Nagar Branch, Hyderabad.

7. The Branch Manager, Axis Bank Ltd. Udyaman Apartment, Boring Road, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sandeep Shahi, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. S. D. Sanjay, Addl. S.G.

Mr. Alok Agrawal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 19-09-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued at length.

The Court is not inclined to entertain the petition. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, as, now, the

Patna High Court CWJC No.6009 of 2018(7) dt.19-09-2018 2/2 petitioner proposes to prefer an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals).

Without expressing anything on the aspect of limitation and whether, now, the appeal, which might have become barred by limitation, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above liberty.

Notices have discharged.

The ad-interim reliefs granted earlier stand vacated forthwith.

(Mukesh R. Shah, CJ) ( Ashutosh Kumar, J) skm/- U