Akhilesh Mehta @ Guddu Mehta @ Guddu Bhaiya @ Guddu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77781 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2025 Thana- TANDWA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Akhilesh Mehta @ Guddu Mehta @ Guddu Bhaiya @ Guddu Kumar S/oMahang Mehta @ Mahnd Mehta R/v- Khushihalpur Po- Matpa Ps- Kutumba Dist- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Nirmala Kumari, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-12-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 196, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1) and 132 of the BNS.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that he stopped a Scorpio vehicle bearing Registration No. 3564 for checking but the persons sitting in the car were not allowing to check the vehicle on the ground that they were coming from a marriage. Further, three more vehicles came from behind of the same wedding party carrying approximately twenty people and they assaulted the informant and others by lathi and danda causing injury to home guard Varun on head and finger.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77781 of 2025(2) dt.02-12-2025 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that petitioner is not having any relation with the family of the grooms in any manner. It is next submitted that petitioner had arranged the car for the groom party for going to the wedding on a purely commercial basis. It is also submitted that even the vehicles described in the FIR do not belong to him and is also not named in the FIR but then his name during the course of investigation surfaced.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No. 55 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T