Mohan Uraon v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71055 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1095 Year-2011 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

MOHAN URAON Son of Chhedi Uraon Resident of Village - Madrahni, P.S.- Bhairoganj, District - West Champaran.

2.

Om Prakash Uraon Son of Jhakad Uraon @ Jhakar Uraon Resident of Village - Madrahni, P.S.- Bhairoganj, District - West Champaran. 3.

Chhedi Uraon Son of Late Ghurai Uraon Resident of Village - Gudgudi, P.S.- Gobardhana, District - West Champaran.

4.

Sant Uraon @ Sanit Uraon Son of Chhedi Uraon Resident of Village - Gudgudi, P.S.- Gobardhana, District - West Champaran. 5.

Rameshwar Uraon Son of Shiv Shankar Uraon Resident of Village - Gudgudi, P.S.- Gobardhana, District - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Lalji Uraon Son of Late Shibu Uraon Resident of Village - Gudgudi, P.S.- Gobardhana, District - West Champaran.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Milind Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-11-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Trial No. 2304 of 2019 (arising out of Complaint Case No. 1095/2011), disclosing offences under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution case is that marriage of daughter of petitioner no. 1 was fixed with the son of complainant and it is alleged that later on marriage could not be solemnized and they did not return the sweets and articles given by the complainant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71055 of 2019(2) dt.07-11-2019 2/2 Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that allegations are false and concocted and due to village politics and mischievous information, the marriage between the daughter of petitioner no. 1 and son of complainant could not be solemnized and due to annoyance, complainant has lodged this false case.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, this application is allowed. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Bagaha, West Chamoparan, in connection with Trial No. 2304 of 2019 (arising out of Complaint Case No. 1095/2011), subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T