Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71094/2019bail granted

Prince Kumar Sharma @ Prince Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-11Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71094 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-289 Year-2019 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== PRINCE KUMAR SHARMA @ PRINCE KUMAR Son of Ramchandra Sharma Resident of Village-Sohagpur, Police Station-Kateya, DistrictGopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Lokesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 21.08.2019 in connection with Kateya P.S.Case No. 289 of 2019 for the alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with the recovery of 45 litres of country-made liquor from the sack carried by the petitioner. The petitioner has already suffered about four months in custody. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71094 of 2019(2) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned IInd Additional Sessions Judge-cumSpecial Judge, Excise, Gopalganj in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 289 of 2019, on the following conditions-- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T