← Library
Patna High Court/78172/2025allowed

Karan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-05Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78172 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-454 Year-2024 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Karan Kumar Son of Late Umesh Chaudhary @ Umesh Chaudhari, Resident of Village - Kachahari Tola, P.S.- Turkaulia, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suraj Kumar Tiwari, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No.454 of 2024 instituted under Sections 309(4), 411 of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant was sitting at his C.S.P. center and doing official work, in the meantime, three miscreants riding on a motorcycle came there and entered in the office and snatched the mobile on the point of gun and also assaulted him.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement made by the coaccused Amanullah who is co-villager of the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner has no connection with the other co-accused persons of this case and with the ulterior

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78172 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026 2/2 motive, the name of petitonier has been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that except the confessional statement of the co-accused, there is no material against the petitioner and no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of petitioner. He further submits that petitioner is a young boy of 21 years, having got clean antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the trial and investigation of the case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No.454 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T