Patna High CourtCR. MISC./79237/2025dismissed

Md. Alauddin v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-11Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79237 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1452 Year-2024 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna ====================================================== Md. Alauddin S/O Md. Jumerati Miya @ Md. Jumrati Resident of MohallaMewa Saw Lane, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna-800006 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 1452 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 309(4) of the BNS, 2023.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 19.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 5467 of 2025, which reads as under:

"Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No.

1452 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 309(4) of the BNS, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons on the point of pistol took away golden ring and earring of the victim while she

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79237 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 was travelling in a three-wheeler in Patna.

4. During investigation, the police have identified the petitioner from the CCTV footage as one of the criminals involved in the loot. Petitioner is in custody since 24.10.2024.

5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this application for regular bail is dismissed."

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits out of six witnesses, one witness has been examined.

5. Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact that the trial has started, I am not inclined to review my earlier order.

6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T