Barkat Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23457 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -413 Year- 2017 Thana -BELAGANJ District- GAYA ====================================================== Barkat Ram, S/o Late Sukar Ram, R/o Vill.- Tikuli, P.S.- Belaganj, DistrictGaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umanath Mishra, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 20-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Belaganj P.S. Case No. 413 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 325, 354, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

In the written report there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 413 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23457 of 2018 (2) dt.20-04-2018 2/2 bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XIth, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T