Arvind Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3382 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8058 of 2023 ====================================================== Arvind Kumar Singh S/o Ram Udgar Singh Resident of Karyanand Nagar, Badi Dargah, Ward No.8, Purani Bazar, Post, P.S. and District- Lakhisarai, at Present Nirmala Sadan, Sharda Nagar, Salona Chak, Behind Mamta Emergency Hospital, Post, P.S. and District- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. K.K. Pathak, Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Mrs. Rekha Kumari, the Director, Higher Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Prof. Jawaharlal, the Vice Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi University, Bhagalpur. 4.

Dr. Niranjan Prasad Yadav, the Registrar, Tilka Manhji University, Bhagalpur.

5.

Mr. Shankar Sharan Ambstha, the Finance Officer, Tilka Manhji, Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

6.

Mr. Pushkar Kumar, the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Shankar Kumar Thakur, AC to GP-27 For the University :

Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-03-2024 Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Shankar Kumar Thakur, learned AC to GP-27 appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, learned counsel for the Tilka Manjhi University.

2. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite parties no. 3 to 5 in which, specific statement has been

Patna High Court MJC No.3382 of 2023(4) dt.20-03-2024 2/2 made in paragraph no. 3 that in compliance of order dated 28.08.2023 passed in CWJC No. 8058 of 2023 substantial amount of payment has been made to the petitioner.

3. So far as, interest is concerned, petitioner, if so advised, may avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

4. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U