Vilash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79535 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2025 Thana- DOBHI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Vilash Yadav Son of Late Bakhauri Yadav Resident of Village - Dariaura, P.S.- Dobhi, District - Gayajee.

2.

Shanti Devi Wife of Vilash Yadav Resident of Village - Dariaura, P.S.- Dobhi, District - Gayajee.

3.

Shukhendra Yadav Son of Vilash Yadav Resident of Village - Dariaura, P.S.- Dobhi, District - Gayajee.

4.

Ravita Devi Wife of Mantu Yadav Resident of Village - Dariaura, P.S.- Dobhi, District - Gayajee and also at Village - Sewai, P.S.- Barachatti, District - Gayajee.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Choubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-01-2026 Earlier, vide order dated 20.11.2025, this anticipatory bail petition stood dismissed as withdrawn in respect of petitioner no. 1 (Vilash Yadav).

2. The petitioners (petitioner nos. 2, 3 & 4) apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per prosecution case, daughter of informant was married to co-accused Bahadur Yadav in the year 2013. On 19.04.2025, daughter of informant informed her father that her in-laws are committing torture to her for dowry and as such, on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79535 of 2025(3) dt.13-01-2026 2/3 the next day, co-accused Vilash Yadav informed informant on phone that his daughter is no more and thereafter, informant with other family members went to matrimonial home of his daughter and saw the dead-body of his daughter. The villagers informed informant that his daughter has been killed by her inlaws family members.

4. Petitioner no. 2 is mother-in-law, petitioner no. 3 is brother-in-law (Devar) and petitioner no. 4 is married sister-inlaw of deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation. Thrust of the accusation is against husband of the deceased, who is already in custody since 03.12.2025. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the family affairs of deceased and her husband.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners.

6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. - I, Sherghati (Gayaji) in connection with Dobhi P.S. Case No. 102 of 2025, subject to condition as laid

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79535 of 2025(3) dt.13-01-2026 3/3 down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

7. This bail application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T