Patna High CourtCR. MISC./70226/2019dismissed

Babloo Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-18Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70226 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-212 Year-2019 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== BABLOO SINGH Son of Ravindra Singh Resident of Village - Amawan, P.S.- Rajauli, District - Nawada.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Nayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 18-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner in this case is seeking regular bail in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 212 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 511, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 18 of the POCSO Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case only to take revenge of humiliation of informant who was caught red handed by petitioner while she was plucking the maize crop from the field of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner is the co-villager and the victim is a major girl but for making out a case of POCSO Act her has been mentioned as 17 years. Learned APP has opposed the prayer of bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70226 of 2019(3) dt.18-12-2019 2/2 wherein the allegation against the petitioner is that of offence committing an attempt to rape the victim lady and the petitioner is in custody for the present from 01.08.2019 only, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner at this stage. The application stands dismissed.

Let the trial be expedited.

The petitioner, however, may renew is prayer for bail after a reasonable period.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U T