Sanjay Kumar Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29821 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2017 Thana- CHANDI District- Bhojpur ======================================================

1. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, Son of Dudheshwar Prasad Singh,

2. Pinku Singh @ Rajeev Ranjan Kumar Singh, Son of Lalan Prasad Singh,

3. Lalan Prasad Singh, Son of Late Alakhdeo Narayan Singh, All resident of Village- Chandi, Police Station- Chandi, DistrictBhojpur ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Md. Ansarul Haque, APP 159 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 10-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 33 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 379 of the Indian Penal Code, 21 of the Mines and Mineral Act, 1957 and 40 of the Mines and Mineral Act, The petitioner is not named in the written report. It is alleged that four persons were apprehended from the spot. The informant also found some poplin machine. petitioners no. 1 and 2 are said to be Ghatwar of Pathalwa Ghat. It is mentioned in paragraph 3 of the petition that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29821 of 2018(3) dt.10-07-2018 2/2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 33 of 2017 they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, XII, Bhojpur at Ara, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Criminal Procedure Code with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel their bail bonds and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.