← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./82064/2024dismissed

Bajrangi Yadav @ Bajrangi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-12-10Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82064 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-236 Year-2024 Thana- BAKHTIYARPUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Bajrangi Yadav @ Bajrangi Kumar S/O Kapil Yadav Resident of VillageLaxhmanpur, P.S- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna. 2.

Barun Yadav S/O Kapil Yadav Resident of Village- Laxhmanpur, P.SBakhtiyarpur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramesh Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-12-2024 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners but learned APP for the State is present.

2. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Baktiyarpur P.S. Case No. 236 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that the petitioners are involved in manufacturing illicit liquor.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have not committed any offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. No such occurrence in the manner as alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82064 of 2024(2) dt.10-12-2024 2/2 has ever taken place. Petitioner have one criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that there is specific allegation against the petitioners and when the police personnel reached at the place of occurrence, the petitioners fled away.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

7. This application is accordingly dismissed. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Guddu/- U T