← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8195/2018withdrawn

Bhogi Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-28Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8195 of 2018 ====================================================== Bhogi Yadav, Son of late Abadh Yadav, Resident of Village- Navtoli Gajhara, P.S.- Ladania, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary Rural and Urban Development Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director Accounts Administration and District Rural Development Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate Madhubani.

4. The Deputy Development Commissioner Cum District Programme Coordinator, Madhubani.

5. The Programme Officer(Manrega) Ladania Madhubani.

6. The Auction Cell Officer-Cum-Sub Division Officer Jainagar Madhubani.

7. The District Rural Development Cell Madhubani through its Secretary.

8. The Block Development Officer, Ladania, Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kinkar Kumar, SC-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-08-2018 Heard.

The present writ application has been filed for quashing of the order dated 13.01.2017, issued vide Memo No.47, under the signature of Respondent No.4, the Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-District Programme Coordinator, Madhubani, as contained in Annexure-1 and orders dated 18.01.2017, as contained in Annexure-2 and 01.04.2017, as contained in Annexure-3, issued by Respondent No.5, the Programme Officer (MANREGA), Ladania, Madhubani, whereby, the petitioner has been directed to deposit 30 % of the amount allocated under plantation scheme to the tune of Rs.2,63,460/-. Further prayer has been made for quashing of certificate proceeding being Auction

Patna High Court CWJC No.8195 of 2018(2) dt.28-08-2018 2/2 Case No.320 of 2017-18, which has been initiated against him. After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ application with a liberty to avail the alternative remedy before the appropriate forum.

The writ application is permitted to be withdrawn. Accordingly, the present writ application is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforementioned. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/- U