Aplendra Singh @ Aplander Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83576 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2024 Thana- DIDARGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== APLENDRA SINGH @ APLANDER SINGH S/O MURAT SINGH @ DHIRENDRA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-FATEHPUR, POLICE STATION- DIDARGANJ, DISTT- PATNA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 14-02-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner in this application prays for bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case no.162 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under sections 307, 341, 323, 325, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the petitioner and one Shubham Kumar are said to have come with iron rod and of having assaulted the informant and his brother causing injuries on their hand and head. They also took away the gold chain.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. It is stated that the allegation of assault on the head is not on this petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83576 of 2024(4) dt.14-02-2025 2/2 but on co-accused Badal. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the case and to abide by any conditions which may be laid by this Court for his release on bail.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State who submits that there is allegation against this petitioner in the FIR of having assaulted with an iron rod causing injuries on the hand as also the head and the same is supported from the injury report.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the FIR, the petitioner and one another having said to have assaulted the informant and his brother on their hand and head with an iron rod together with the corresponding injuries having been found in the injury report in course of investigation, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail and the application is rejected.

7. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the learned Court below within a period of four weeks.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T