Bambam Yadav @ Amit Kumaryadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83666 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2022 Thana- TIKAPATTI District- Purnia ====================================================== Bambam Yadav @ Amit Kumaryadav Son Of Akhilesh Yadav Resident Of Village - Dhusar, Ward No.06, P.S. - Tikapatti, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 21-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Tikapatti P.S. Case No. 22 of 2022 lodged on 08.03.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 302/201/120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against three named accused persons including the present petitioner and it has been alleged that the accident has been caused at the instance of the co-accused which resulted into death of the deceased who is the son of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel also submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83666 of 2023(6) dt.21-06-2024 2/2 clean. Counsel further submits that the police has submitted the final form in this case, but subsequently, learned Court below has taken cognizance. Counsel submits that in the case diary, independent witnesses has alleged that name of the petitioner has been figured in this case because the vehicle on which the alleged accident took place, belongs to the petitioner. Counsel further submits that one co-accused person has been granted anticipatory bail and another co-accused person has been granted regular bail which is attached in the bail application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. As such, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Purnea, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U T