Abhiranjan Kumar @ Rahul v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77387 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2024 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Abhiranjan Kumar @ Rahul son of Parmanand Singh Resident of villageBelsandi Tara Ward no 07, POlice Station- Bibhutipur Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Bibhutipur P.S. case No. 11 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 1265.4 liters liquor was recovered from tanker.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case in course of investigation. The petitioner is neither

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77387 of 2025(2) dt.17-11-2025 2/2 the owner nor the driver of the seized vehicle. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been implicated on extraneous consideration. The petitioner is in custody since 15.09.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S., 2023. Co-accused has been granted bail by this Bench vide order dated 21.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 56366 of 2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. case No. 11 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Pankaj/- U T